Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd.
No.7-101 and 8A-104, Building 7 and 8, DCC Cuttural and Creative Garden, No.98, Pingxin North Road, Shangmugu Community, Pinghu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
Report No.: GTS20190903009-1-4-2
Contents
TEST REPORT
| Test Report No. | GTS20190903009-1-4-2 | Do 18,2019 |
| Date of issue |
| Equipment under Test | WIRELESS CHARGER |
| Model /Type | UT-16 |
| Listed Models | WG-3B, UT-15, UT-22, UT-14, UT-21, UT-20, UT-30 |
| Applicant | JE DEVELOPMENT GROUPLIMITED |
| Address | FLAT BO7 FLO023, HOVER INDUSTRIAL BUILDING, NO 26-38 KWAI CHEONG ROAD. N.T. HONG KONG |
| Manufacturer | JE DEVELOPMENT GROUPLIMITED |
| Address | FLAT BO7 FLO023, HOVER INDUSTRIAL BUILDING, NO 26-38 KWAI CHEONG ROAD. N.T. HONG KONG |
| Factory | SHEN ZHEN JEWAY TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD |
| Address | C BUILDING YANBIAN XUEZIWEI INDUXTRY SHAJING CITY BAOAN DIS SHENZHEN, CHINA |
| Test Result: | PASS |
The test report merely corresponds to the test sample.
It is not permitted to copy extracts of these test result without the written permission of the test laboratory.
SUMMARY
1.1 General Remarks
| Date of receipt of test sample | Sep. 20,2019 |
| Testing commenced on | Dec. 17, 2019 |
| Testing concluded on | Dec. 18, 2019 |
1.2 Product Description
| Product Name: | WIRELESS CHARGER |
| Model/Type reference: | UT-16 |
| Power supply: | DC 12V from adapter |
| Adapter information: | Model: TEKA024-1202000UK Input: 100-240V~, 50/60Hz;0.7A MAX Output: 12V===2A |
| Wireless Charger | |
| Antenna Type | Coil Antenna |
| Antenna Gain | 0.0dBi |
| Operation frequency | 110KHz~205KHz |
| Modulation Type | ASK |
1.3 Description of the test mode
Equipment under test was operated during the measurement under the following conditions:
[X] Charging and communication mode
| Test Conditions | Description | |
| TM 1 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1(Battery Status: <1%) | Pre-tested |
| TM2 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1(Battery Status: <50%) | Pre-tested |
| TM3 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1(Battery Status: 100%) | Pre-tested |
| TM4 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 2(Battery Status: <1%) | Pre-tested |
| TM5 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 2(Battery Status: <50%) | Pre-tested |
| TM6 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 2(Battery Status: 100%) | Pre-tested |
| TM7 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <1%) | Pre-tested |
| TM8 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <50%) | Pre-tested |
| TM9 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: 100%) | Pre-tested |
| TM10 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+ Mobile Phone 2(Battery Status: <1%) | Pre-tested |
| TM11 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+ Mobile Phone 2(Battery Status: <50%) | Pre-tested |
| TM12 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+ Mobile Phone 2(Battery Status: 100%) | Pre-tested |
| TM13 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <1%) | Pre-tested |
| TM14 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <50%) | Pre-tested |
| TM15 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: 100%) | Pre-tested |
| TM16 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 2+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <1%) | Pre-tested |
| TM17 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 2+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <50%) | Pre-tested |
| TM18 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 2+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: 100%) | Pre-tested |
| TM19 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+Mobile Phone 2+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <1%) |
Record |
| TM20 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+Mobile Phone 2+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: <50%) |
Record |
| TM21 | AC/DC Adapter (12V/2A) + EUT + Mobile Phone 1+Mobile Phone 2+ Mobile Phone 3(Battery Status: 100%) |
Record |
| Note: All test modes were pre-tested, but we only recorded the worst case in this report. | ||
1.4 Modifications
No modifications were implemented to meet testing criteria.
TEST ENVIRONMENT
2.1 Address of the test laboratory
Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd.
No.7-101 and 8A-104, Building 7 and 8, DCC Cultural and Creative Garden, No.98, Pingxin North Road, Shangmugu Community, Pinghu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
The 3m-Semi anechoic test site fulfils CISPR 16-1-4 according to ANSI C63.4:2014 and CISPR 16-1-4:2010 SVSWR requirement for radiated emission above 1GHz.
2.2 Test Facility
The test facility is recognized, certified, or accredited by the following organizations:
FCC-Registration No.: 165725
Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd EMC Laboratory has been registered and fully described in a report filed with the (FCC) Federal Communications Commission. The acceptance letter from the FCC is maintained in our files.
A2LA-Lab Cert. No.: 4758.01
Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. EMC Laboratory has been accredited by A2LA for technical competence in the field of electrical testing, and proved to be in compliance with ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories and any additional program requirements in the identified field of testing.
CNAS-Lab Code: L8169
Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. has been assessed and proved to be in compliance with CNAS- CLO1 Accreditation Criteria for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (identical to ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 General Requirements) for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Date of Registration: Dec. 11, 2015. Valid time is until Dec. 10, 2024.
2.3 Environmental conditions
During the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges:
| Temperature: | 15-35°C |
| Humidity: | 30-60 % |
| Atmospheric pressure: | 950-1050mbar |
2.4 Summary of measurement results
| Test ltem | Result |
| Electric Field Strength (E) (V/m) | Compliant |
| Magnetic Field Strength (H) (A/m) | Compliant |
2.5 Statement of the measurement uncertainty
The data and results referenced in this document are true and accurate. The reader is cautioned that there may be errors within the calibration limits of the equipment and facilities. The measurement uncertainty was calculated for all measurements listed in this test report acc. to CISPR 16 – 4 ,Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC Measurements” and is documented in the Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd quality system acc. to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025. Furthermore, component and process variability of devices similar to that tested may result in additional deviation. The manufacturer has the sole responsibility of continued compliance of the device.
Hereafter the best measurement capability for Shenzhen GTS laboratory is reported:
| Test | Range | Measurement Uncertainty | Notes |
| Radiated Emission | 30~1000MHz | 4.10dB | 1) |
| Radiated Emission | 1~18GHz | 4.32dB | 1) |
| Radiated Emission | 18-40GHz | 5.54dB | 1) |
| Conducted Disturbance | 0.15~30MHz | 3.12dB | 1) |
(1) This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.
2.6 Equipments Used during the Test
| Description | Brand | Model No. | Frequency Range | Calibrated Date | Calibrated Until |
| Broadband Field Meter |
NARDA | NBM-550 | – | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| Magnetic Field Meter | NARDA | ELT-400 | 1 — 400kHz | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| Magnetic Probe | NARDA | HF-3061 | 300kHz — 30MHz | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| Magnetic Probe | NARDA | HF-0191 | 27 — 1000MHz | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| Broadband Field Meter |
NARDA | NBM-550 | – | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| Electric Field Meter | COMBINOVA | EFM 200 | 5Hz — 400kHz | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| E-Field Probe | NARDA | EF-0391 | 100kHz — 3GHz | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
| E-Field Probe | NARDA | EF-6091 | 100MHz — 60GHz | Dec. 28, 2018 | Dec. 27, 2019 |
Note: The Cal.Interval was one year.
TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS
3.1 Applicable Standard
According to §1.1307(b)(1), systems operating under the provisions of this section shall be operated in a manner that ensures that the public is not exposed to radio frequency energy level in excess of the Commission’s guidelines.
According to §1.1310 and §2.1091 RF exposure is calculated.
According KDB 680106 D01 RF Exposure Wireless Charging App v03
3.2 Limit
Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)/Controlled Exposure
| Frequency Range(MHz) | Electric Field Strength(V/m) | Magnetic Field Strength(A/m) | Power Density (mW/cm2) | Averaging Time (minute) |
| Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure | ||||
| 0.3 – 3.0 | 614 | 2. | (100) * | 6 |
| 3.0 – 30 | 1842/f | 4.89/f | (900/f)* | 6 |
| 30 – 300 | 61. | 0.163 | 1.0 | 6 |
| 300 – 1500 | / | / | f/300 | 6 |
| 1500 – 100,000 | / | / | 5 | 6 |
Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)/Uncontrolled Exposure
| Frequency Range(MHz) |
Electric Field Strength(V/m) |
Magnetic Field Strength(A/m) |
Power Density (mW/cm2) |
Averaging Time (minute) |
| Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure | ||||
| 0.3 — 3.0 | 614 | 2. | (100) | 30 |
| 3.0 — 30 | 824/f | 2.19/f | (180/f)* | 30 |
| 30 – 300 | 28. | 0.073 | 0.2 | 30 |
| 300 – 1500 | / | / | f/1500 | 30 |
| 1500 – 100.000 | / | / | 1.0 | 30 |
F=frequency in MHz
*=Plane-wave equivalent power density
3.3 Test Setup
Note: A, B, C, D, E, F for six surfaces of the product.
3.4 Measurement Procedure
a) The RF exposure test was performed on 360 degree turn table in anechoic chamber.
b) The measurement probe was placed at test distance (10cm) which is between the edge of the charger and the geometric centre of probe.
c) The turn table was rotated 360d degree to search of highest strength.
d) The highest emission level was recorded and compared with limit as soon as measurement of each points (A, B, C, D, E) were completed.
e) The EUT were measured according to the dictates of KDB 680106 D01 RF Exposure Wireless Charging App v03.
3.5 Test Result of E and H field Strength
E-Field Strength at 15 cm from the edges surrounding the EUT and 15cm from the top surface of the EUT
| Test port | Charging Battery
Level |
Frequency Range (MHz) | Measured E-Field Strength Values (V/m) | FCC E- Field Strength 50% Limits (V/m) | FCC E- Field Strength Limits (V/m)
|
||||
| Test
Position A |
Test Position
B |
Test
Position C |
Test
Position D |
Test
Position E |
|||||
| Phone
port 1 |
1% | 0.145 | 2.57 | 2.46 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 3.44 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.35 | 2.21 | 1.94 | 1.97 | 3.14 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 1.05 | 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 1.31 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| Phone
port 2 |
1% | 0.145 | 2.52 | 2.66 | 1.95 | 1.98 | 3.76 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.24 | 2.38 | 1.80 | 1.85 | 2.85 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.95 | 1.10 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| Phone
port 3 |
1% | 0.145 | 2.44 | 2.80 | 2.05 | 2.19 | 3.54 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.15 | 2.53 | 1.79 | 1.84 | 3.20 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 1.42 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
H-Field Strength at 15 cm from the edges surrounding the EUT and 15cm from the top surface of the EUT
| Test
port |
Chargin
g Battery Level |
Frequency
Range (MHz) |
Measured E-Field Strength | Values (&m)
Test Position D |
FCC H-
Field Strength 50% Limits (Aim) |
FCC H-
Field Strength Limits (A/m) |
|||
| Test
Position A |
Test
Position B |
Test
Position C |
Test
Position E |
||||||
| Phone
port 1 |
1% | 0.145 | 0.211 | 0.209 | 0.187 | 0.190 | 0.268 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.201 | 0.190 | 0.172 | 0.184 | 0.259 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.105 | 0.098 | 0.087 | 0.078 | 0.175 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| Phone
port 2 |
1% | 0.145 | 0.220 | 0.202 | 0.160 | 0.191 | 0.301 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.186 | 0.168 | 0.149 | 0.179 | 0.285 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.084 | 0.098 | 0.054 | 0.097 | 0.204 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| Phone
port 3 |
1% | 0.145 | 0.220 | 0.196 | 0.154 | 0.223 | 0.253 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.194 | 0.198 | 0.147 | 0.213 | 0.250 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.098 | 0.072 | 0.073 | 0.085 | 0.210 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
H-Field Strength at 20cm from the top surface of the EUT
| Test port | Charging
Battery Level |
Frequency
Range (MHz) |
Measured E-Field Strength
Values (A/m) |
FCC H-Field
Strength 50% Limits (A/m) |
FCC H-Field
Strength Limits (A/m) |
| Test Position E | |||||
| Phone
port 1 |
1% | 0.145 | 0213 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.212 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.128 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| Phone
port 2 |
1% | 0.145 | 0.248 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.237 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.155 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| Phone
port 3 |
1% | 0.145 | 0211 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.215 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.155 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
3.6 Simultaneous E-Filed Strength and H-Filed Strength
KDB 447498 points for simultaneous transmission on far-filed measurement, while for below 30 MHz usually measured at near-filed. KDB680106 require aggregate leakage fields at 15 cm surrounding the device from all simultaneous transmitting coils are demonstrated to be less than 50% of the MPE limit; KDB680106 can accept using field strength, power density, SAR measurements or computational modeling etc., the specific authorization requirements will be determined based on the results of the RF exposure evaluation.
Test labs suggest use Computational modelling to calculate Nerve Stimulation BRs; Computational modelling, such as finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) may be used to demonstrate compliance with FCC § 1.1310 limits requirement, Basic Calculations – The following calculations may be used to evaluate systems without consideration for the effects of phase resulting from multiple frequency and/or multiple antennas co-located in the measurement space, which may overestimate the actual result. If the result exceeds the limits, the advanced calculations described,iln follows may be used.
Where:
E-field measurements
Eave = Spatial average
Ewvarus = E-field at
a measurement point
N = Number of spatially averaged points
And
Where:
H-field levels of magnetic field strength
Have = Spatial average
Hwmaxrvs = H-field at a measurement point
N = Number of spatially averaged points
E-Filed Strength at 15 cm from the edges surrounding the EUT and 15 cm above the top surface
| Spatial Average |
Chargin
9 Level |
Frequenc y Range (MHz) |
Measured E-Field Strength Values (V/m) | FCC E- Field Strength 50% Limits (V/m) |
FCC E- Field Strength Limits (V/m) |
||||
| Test Position A |
Test Position B |
Test Position C |
Test Position D |
Test Position E |
|||||
| EAVG
Phcnel +Ph one2 |
1% | 0.145 | 2.55 | 2.56 | 2.04 | 2.09 | 3.60 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.30 | 2.30 | 1.87 | 1.91 | 3.00 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 1.24 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| EAVG
Phcnel +Ph one3 |
1% | 0.145 | 2.51 | 2.63 | 2.09 | 2.20 | 3.49 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.25 | 2.37 | 1.87 | 1.91 | 3.17 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.37 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| EAVG
Phone2+Ph |
1% | 0.145 | 2.48 | 2.73 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 3.65 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.20 | 2.46 | 1.80 | 1.85 | 3.03 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.97 | 1.07 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 1.30 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| EAVG
Phonel +Ph 3 |
1% | 0.145 | 2.51 | 2.64 | 2.04 | 2.12 | 3.58 | 307.0 | 614.0 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 2.25 | 2.37 | 1.84 | 1.89 | 3.06 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 1.30 | 307.0 | 614.0 | |
H-Filed Strength at 15 cm from the edges surrounding the EUT and 15 cm above the top surface
| Spatial Average |
Chargin
g Level |
Frequenc y Range (MHz) |
Measured H-Field Strength Values (A/m) | FCC H-
Field Strength 50% Limits (A/m) Limits |
FCC H- Field Strength(A/m) |
||||
| Test Position A |
Test Position B |
Test Position C |
Test Position D |
Test Position E |
|||||
| HAVG
Phonel +Ph |
1% | 0.145 | 0.216 | 0.206 | 0.174 | 0.191 | 0.285 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.194 | 0.179 | 0.161 | 0.182 | 0.272 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.095 | 0.098 | 0.071 | 0.088 | 0.190 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| HAVG
Phonel +Ph |
1% | 0.145 | 0.216 | 0.203 | 0.171 | 0.207 | 0.261 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.198 | 0.194 | 0.160 | 0.199 | 0.255 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.102 | 0.085 | 0.080 | 0.082 | 0.193 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| HAVG
Phone2+Ph |
1% | 0.145 | 0.220 | 0.199 | 0.157 | 0.207 | 0.277 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.190 | 0.183 | 0.148 | 0.196 | 0.268 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.091 | 0.085 | 0.064 | 0.091 | 0.207 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| HAVG
Phonel +Ph |
1% | 0.145 | 0.217 | 0.202 | 0.167 | 0.201 | 0.274 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.194 | 0.185 | 0.156 | 0.192 | 0265 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.096 | 0.089 | 0.071 | 0.087 | 0.196 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
H-Field Strength at 20cm from the top surface of the EUT
| Charge Port |
Charging Battery Level |
Frequency Range (MHz) |
Measured H-Field Strength Values (Alm) |
FCC H-Field Strength 50%imits LWm) |
FCC H-Field Strength Limits (Aim) |
| Test Position E | |||||
| HAVG
Phonel +Pilo ne2 |
1 % | 0.145 | 0.231 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.225 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.142 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| HAVG
Phonel +Pho ne3 |
1% | 0.145 | 0.212 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.214 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.142 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| HAVG
Phone2+Pho |
1% | 0.145 | 0.230 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.226 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.155 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| HAVG
Phonel +Pho |
1% | 0.145 | 0.224 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
| 50% | 0.145 | 0.221 | 0.815 | 1.63 | |
| 99% | 0.145 | 0.146 | 0.815 | 1.63 |
Report No.: GTS20190903009-1-4-2
3.7 Equipment Approval Considerations
The EUT does comply with KDB 680106 D01 as follow table.
| Requirements of KDB 680106 DO1 | Yes / No | Description |
| Power transfer frequency is less than 1 MHz | Yes | The device operate in the frequency range 110KHz-205KHz |
| Output power from each primary coil is less than 15 watts | Yes | The maximum output power for each primary coil is 10W. |
| The transfer system includes only single
primary and secondary coils. This includes charging systems that may have multiple primary coils and clients that are able to detect and allow coupling only between individual pairs of coils. |
No | The transfer system includes 3 primary coils. |
| Client device is placed directly in contact with the transmitter. | Yes | Client device is placed directly in contact with the transmitter. |
| Mobile exposure conditions only (portable
exposure conditions are not covered by this exclusion). |
Yes | Mobile exposure conditions only |
| The aggregate H-field strengths at 15 cm surrounding the device and 20 cm above the top surface from all simultaneous transmitting coils are demonstrated to be less than 50% of the MPE limit. | Yes | The EUT H-field strengths at 15 cm surrounding the device and 20 cm above the top surface from all simultaneous transmitting coils are demonstrated to be less than 50% of the MPE limit. |
3.8 Conclusion
The detected emissions with a distance of 15cm surrounding the device and 20 cm above the top surface of the device are below the FCC E-Field Strength & H-Field Strength limits; The detected emissions are below the limitations according FCC KDB 680106 and confirmed by the FCC according to KDB Inquire.
Test Setup Photos of the EUT
